The Grounded Imams; Stranger Behavior Than Prayers
Posted on November 28, 2006
Remember the Imams that CAIR was so quick to defend after they were booted from a Minneapolis flight last week? Remember how they claimed they were only praying and how humiliated they were by our reactions? They’ve been staging protests and making as much noise as possible over all of this ever since.
Well, Audrey Hudson reports a fuller picture of what happened in today’s Washington Times. It looks like these Islamic religious leaders were engaging in much stranger behavior than simply praying.
Muslim religious leaders removed from a Minneapolis flight last week exhibited behavior associated with a security probe by terrorists and were not merely engaged in prayers, according to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials.
Witnesses said three of the imams were praying loudly in the concourse and repeatedly shouted “Allah” when passengers were called for boarding US Airways Flight 300 to Phoenix.
“I was suspicious by the way they were praying very loud,” the gate agent told the Minneapolis Police Department.
Passengers and flight attendants told law-enforcement officials the imams switched from their assigned seats to a pattern associated with the September 11 terrorist attacks and also found in probes of U.S. security since the attacks — two in the front row first-class, two in the middle of the plane on the exit aisle and two in the rear of the cabin.
“That would alarm me,” said a federal air marshal who asked to remain anonymous. “They now control all of the entry and exit routes to the plane.”
A pilot from another airline said: “That behavior has been identified as a terrorist probe in the airline industry.”
Of course the Imams are latching on to the old race card here and trying to claim they were the victims of racial profiling. They are making a lot of noise and have even called upon Congress to create laws against passenger profiling. But make no mistake, it wasn’t the color of these men’s skin that got them kicked off the plane, nor was it any religious practices or American ignorance and insensitivity. The reason these men were not allowed flight was because of a combination of strange behavior.
According to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials, the imams displayed other suspicious behavior.
Three of the men asked for seat-belt extenders, although two flight attendants told police the men were not oversized. One flight attendant told police she “found this unsettling, as crew knew about the six [passengers] on board and where they were sitting.” Rather than attach the extensions, the men placed the straps and buckles on the cabin floor, the flight attendant said.
The imams said they were not discussing politics and only spoke in English, but witnesses told law enforcement that the men spoke in Arabic and English, criticizing the war in Iraq and President Bush, and talking about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.
The imams who claimed two first-class seats said their tickets were upgraded. The gate agent told police that when the imams asked to be upgraded, they were told no such seats were available. Nevertheless, the two men were seated in first class when removed.
A flight attendant said one of the men made two trips to the rear of the plane to talk to the imam during boarding, and again when the flight was delayed because of their behavior. Aviation officials, including air marshals and pilots, said these actions alone would not warrant a second look, but the combination is suspicious.
“That’s like shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater. You just can’t do that anymore,” said Robert MacLean, a former air marshal.
“They should have been denied boarding and been investigated,” Mr. MacLean said. “It looks like they are trying to create public sympathy or maybe setting someone up for a lawsuit.”
Indeed, they may have been looking for a lawsuit. As Aviation security officials pointed out, thousands of Muslims fly every day and conduct prayers in airports in a quiet and private manner without creating incidents. These Imams seem to have went out of their way to get attention, create a scene, and then cry the victim. I think U.S. Airways made a very good decision. I hope that all the crying, protests, boycotting, and lawsuit threats don’t intimidate them and that they practice good judgement like this on all their flights. I think they have set a good example of how to correctly use behavior as a way of identifying potential threats. I know the next time I fly, the vigilant effort towards safety displayed by U.S. Airways will be a good reason to choose them.
Sister Toldjah is on the same page:
In the end, this may turn out to be much ado about nothing, but the flight crew shouldn’t be made to feel guilty about doing their jobs, nor the passengers for being concerned. Considering the number of flight attendants and pilots who had their throats slashed by the 9-11 hijackers, and the thousands of people murdered that day both on airliners and in buildings, I don’t blame any airline nor passenger for attempting to be pro-active to try to ensure that something like that doesn’t happen on their flights.
The professional victimologists at CAIR think that they can put on this idiotic production and rally the American people to their cause. They have, as usual, miscalculated badly. And if this Muslim “civil rights” organization spent 1/10 the time it spends on weeping about “Islamaphobia” as it could on denouncing without reservation or qualification the madmen who seek to destroy us, people would probably listen more closely to what they had to say.
Hot Air has video of Michelle Malkin discussing this on O’Reilly and a vent.
More.
Michelle Malkin has a good roundup and adds:
I think these people have finally worn out their welcome. Yes, they’ll always have their apologists in the media. Yes, they have their water-carriers in Congress. But their incessant victim politicking–combined with their shady ties and their refusal to condemn jihad at home and around the world–has eroded America’s good will.
Unfortunately, members of Congress seem more intent on pandering to the victimology rather than supporting the airlines for doing their job. Sheila Jackson-Lee and newly-elected Muslim Keith Ellison both took the time to acknowledge how humiliating it had to be for the six men ejected from the flight, rather than how stressful it must have been for the passengers and crew of the US Air flight that the imams used to gain their notoriety. I guess they figure that it’s better to be sorry than safe.
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, News, War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
5 Responses to “The Grounded Imams; Stranger Behavior Than Prayers”
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Advertise
Donate
Steal Me
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
More blogs about the ACLU
I would think we could use US Airways to fly more than other airlines and also email, phone or writer letters of support to them. It may not stop what this crazy islamoterrorists do in relation to law suits, but knowing they are supported in what they did should help some. Otherwise, I know not what else to do. This is going to continue.
Looking for a lawsuit? maybe. I think they were intentionally trying to trip the ‘terrorist’ profile in order to screw wist our airline security.
While I HATE the idea that this:
was even a factor, the seating behavior seems to justify their removal. Any idea why these details took so long to come out?
MM calls it ‘victin politiking’ perfectly describes the despicableness of what they are doing- attempting to trample our rights to safety and security by playing some immagined racial profiling card to strongarm politicians into making laws that will reduce our safety as a nation. http://sacredscoop.com
“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. ” Mark Twain