ACLU Should Lose Its Tax Exempt Status
Posted on October 11, 2006
Huge thanks to Greg Tinti of the Political Pitbull for the video!
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads opposing candidates that did not adhere to certain “American values” as interpreted by that Church? What if a Christian Religious organization were to use its official title to oppose certain political issues such as abortion?
We don’t have to imagine, the ACLU’s history shows us. They would challenge that Church’s tax exempt status.
“In 1970, the year after the ACLU issued its first policy opposing the tax exempt status for churches; it accepted the advice of church and state extremist Leo Pfeffer and drafted a brief opposing tax exemptions in Waltz v. Tax Commission. In 1987, the ACLU Foundation and the New York Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief in support of Abortion Rights Mobilization to secure standing in a suit challenging the tax exempt status of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church was charged with violating its tax-exempt status by taking a stand against abortion.”Source
However the ACLU’s official policy goes even further. In the ACLU’s eyes a Church doesn’t even have to be politically involved to deserve having its tax exempt status stripped.
During the 1988 presidential campaign the ACLU was brought under the spotlight. Michael Dukakis, the democrat nominee, proudly stated, “I’m a card-carrying member of the American Civil Liberties Union.” These words would soon come back to haunt him. I will not focus too much on this campaign other than using it as evidence of the ACLU’s position on the tax exemption of churches. However, Dukakis’s association with this group proved to be a major factor in his defeat.
During the first debate, Peter Jennings of ABC asked George Bush why he continued to make an issue out of Dukakis’s membership in the ACLU. Bush replied that he didn’t like most of the ACLU’s positions and offered four of them. We will just focus on the one we are talking about right now. Bush said, “I don’t think they’re right to try to take away the tax exemption of the Catholic Church.”
The ACLU doesn’t deny their position! Norman Dorsen, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1976 to 1991, refuted Bush’s statements, and said that the ACLU opposes tax exemption for all churches, not just the Catholic Church.Source
Here is a little more history on the issue from Twilight of Liberty.
“ACLU founder Roger Baldwin once told me that the ACLU’s desire to strip the churches of their tax exempt status was “very foolish.” But in 1969, some nineteen years after Baldwin stepped down as executive director, the Union adopted its first policy opposing “tax exemption for church property which is used exclusively for religious purposes.’ In the latest policy on this subject, it makes no difference to the Union whether church property is not used exclusively for religious purposes, all are denied: “The ACLU opposes tax benefits for religious bodies”, seven examples are listed for clarification, including the benefit of tax exemption.”Source
The ACLU proudly claims that they are “wholly non-partisan.” It portrays itself as an objective organization that is “neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor Democrat.” They say instead that they are “a public interest organization devoted exclusively to protecting the basic civil liberties of all Americans.” However, while the ACLU was taking aim at the Catholic Church’s tax exempt status, the Union affiliate in Providence, Rhode Island, came out in favor of a tax exemption for Wiccans. They went and got a tax administrator to rule that a coven of witches were entitled the same tax-exemption as churches had.
Does this sound like the position of a “nonpartisan” group? Does it sound like the position of a group that should be tax exempt? What happened to opposing tax exemptions on all religious bodies? Pick your policy. Either oppose it for all, or fight to expand it to all. You can’t claim non-partisanship while opposing it for one religious body and fighting to expand it to others.
Now imagine if an organization claiming to be non-partisan used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. What if this organization used its funds to create political ads opposing candidates that did not adhere to certain “American values” as interpreted by that organization?
We don’t have to imagine, the ACLU’s hypocrisy shows us. It also has once again brought it into internal division as one local branch thinks it crossed the line. The Political Pit Bull has video of this being talked about on O’Reilly.
Leaders of the ACLU’s Connecticut affiliate have objected to an advertisement placed by the national ACLU that ran in the Hartford Courant late last month. The advertisement focused on Senator Lieberman, a Democrat who is running as an independent after losing a primary bid to an anti-war candidate, Ned Lamont.
“Will Senator Joe Lieberman pass this test on American values?” the ad asks. It features Mr. Lieberman’s photograph and office telephone number, along with warnings about pending legislation about detainees, torture, and wiretapping. “Tell Joe Lieberman his votes on this assault on American values will help determine your vote in November,” the ad says.
The chairman of the board of the Connecticut ACLU, Don Noel Jr., said he and several other board members felt it breached the organization’s pledge to stay out of electoral politics.
“It seemed to us to cross the line on partisanship, or to cross the line on not being nonpartisan,” Mr. Noel told The New York Sun yesterday. “I have complained and the national office has agreed with me. They have said they are sorry this might have been seen as partisan.” NY Sun
The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple glimpse at the ACLU’s record shows many examples of how this is untrue. While the ACLU has proudly made abortion its number one priority it has not only ignored the free speech of abortion protesters but actively fought to silence them.
William Donohue accurately argues:
“Social reform, in a liberal direction, is the sine qua non of the ACLU. Its record, far from showing a momentary wavering from impartiality, is replete with attempts to reform American society according to the wisdom of liberalism. The truth of the matter is that the ACLU has always been a highly politicized organization.”Source
Throughout its history the ACLU has revealed its partisanship. It opposed the Viet Nam War. It demanded unilateral nuclear disarmament. It called for disinvestment in South Africa. It violated its own policy in order to stymie the nomination of William Rehnquist to the Supreme Court. During the eight years of the Reagan Administration, it blasted the President with one invective after another much as it does today with President Bush. It led the fight to defeat the confirmation of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court and more recently the confirmation of Samuel Alito. It frequently writes speeches for candidates that it likes. It lobbies its cause to Congress. Did you know that it has divided itself into two groups? The ACLU and the ACLU Foundation. This allows them to work the courts with one hand while being paid by taxpayer funding when the win, and lobby to Congress with the other. It even issues scorecards on Senators and Representatives evaluating their performance according to the ACLU’s own ideological measuring stick. Source
The American Civil Liberties Union is destroying America’s culture and Constitution, while the federal government allows it to operate as a nonprofit, tax-exempt charitable organization. Non-profit organizations are not supposed to spend their tax-exempt assets on political campaigning, because that is not the purpose for which they were given the exemption. Furthermore, if an organization is to benefit by claiming non-partisanship it should practice that concept consistently and be held to those standards, unlike the ACLU’s double standard practices.
As a result of the above examples and much more, I believe that the ACLU has forfeited its right to operate as a tax-exempt organization. It is a political organization and should not be subsidized by my tax dollars. The IRS should do away with tax exemptions of political organizations hiding behind the mask of being non-profit and non-partisan. If only we could find some politicians willing to push for it.
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, ACLU, Church And State, History, News
Trackback URL
Comments
49 Responses to “ACLU Should Lose Its Tax Exempt Status”
Affiliations
The Giants
-
VIDEO: The ACLU Takes Out Ads Against Lieberman
Of course, the ACLU isn’t really supposed to do things like that since it enjoys tax-exempt status based on the organization’s claim that its a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization. The latter, obviously, posing the problem in this instance. Here’…
ACLU Is Not Non-Partisan
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads oppo…
Yank The ACLU’s Tax Exempt Status
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations…
[...] Jay at Stop the ACLU presents his case with several examples, video, and many, many links. [...]
[...] Jay at Stop the ACLU presents his case with several examples, video, and many, many links. [...]
Do Away With The ACLU’s Free Ride
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads oppo…
The ACLU Should Not Get Tax Exempt Status
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads oppo…
[...] Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads opposing candidates that did not adhere to certain “American values” as interpreted by that Church? What if a Christian Religious organization were to use its official title to oppose certain political issues such as abortion? We don’t have to imagine, the ACLU’s history shows us. They would challenge that Church’s tax exempt status. [...]
Why Is The ACLU Still Tax Exempt?
Jay at Stop the ACLU makes a compelling case that the ACLU should lose its tax exempt status.The ACLU proudly claims that they are “wholly non-partisan.” It portrays itself as an objective organization that is “neither liberal nor conservative, Repu…
Stop The ACLU: ACLU Should Lose Tax Exempt Status
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt…
Stop the ACLU Blogburst
Crossposted from Stop The ACLUImagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards polit …
Should the ACLU be stripped of their tax exempt status?
ACLU Should Lose Its Tax Exempt Status [video link] Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used
Should The ACLU Be Stripped Of Their Tax Exempt Status?
Allah Pundit @ Hot-Air asks the question, and Jay @ Stop The ACLU presents a solid case for the revocation of their status.Jay brings up the ever important question, especially this close to the election:Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax
Stop the ACLU Blogburst
Crossposted from: Stop The ACLU Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations
ACLU Not A Religion?
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads opposing candidates that did not adh…
From what I heard your case involving the coven of witches has a weakness in it since the ACLU could have seen tax emption for religious organizations as a fait accompli and therefore though fair treatment. If that is the case then they might actually have been working in accordance with the First Amendment for once.
Stop The ACLU Blogburst: ACLU Should Lose Tax Excempt Status
From Stop The ACLU. Make sure you click the link to go see the video.
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt …
Stop The ACLU BlogBurst /
And It’s Thursday, Stop The ACLU blogburst day. They also have a post that questions whether or not the ACLU deserves it’s status as a tax-exempt non-profit organization.
I don’t think so Kerwin. You are either for the tax exemption or against it. Maybe that little local branch just wasn’t on page with the National. It wouldn’t be the first time.
[...] [...]
The ACLU’s Tax Status
Jay at Stop the ACLU makes a good case for the ACLU losing its tax-exempt status due to direct involvement in political campaigns. The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple…
[...] Should the ACLU lose its tax exempt status? Imagine if a church was using its status to push certain political agendas or campaigns. Oh the horror that would follow! Here is a case built up of why the ACLU should not have tax exempt status. Stop The ACLU ? Blog Archive ? ACLU Should Lose Its Tax Exempt Status [...]
‘The ACLU is destroying America’s culture and Constitution’… should they be tax-exempt?
(Crossposted from Stop The ACLU)Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards polit …
Web Reconnaissance for 10/12/2006
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.
ACLU Should Lose Its Tax Exempt Status
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads o…
First, I am by no means a supporter of the ACLU. I just want to make that clear up front.
It should be noted that the ACLU is composed to two entities. This is something that often times seems to be overlooked.
See this page.
The ACLU proper is NOT a 501(c)(3) organization. Contributions to it are not tax deductible. This is the nasty element that does all of the lobbying.
The ACLU Foundation is the tax-exempt element. From the site:
“By contrast, most of the ACLU’s litigation and communication efforts described in this Web site are done by the ACLU Foundation.”
The foundation side engages in a lot of litigation that we oppose, but that behavior doesn’t violate the tax exempt status of the foundation. In reality, this isn’t any different from what the Alliance Defense Fund does. They are both tax-exempt groups that provide legal assitance. Granted, the ACLU Foundation is litigating for ideas that we oppose, but having an idea doesn’t mean you can’t be tax-exempt. I know it’s a fine line.
Daily Summary
NEWS: - First US Citizen Indicted for Treason Since WWII Era - Bush Pledges to Build the Fence - Federal Budget Deficit Falls to Lowest Point in Four Years - Plane Slams Into NY Apartment Building - GOP seeks Berger…
“Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns.”
Yeah, and imagine if the sky was blue, and water was wet, and ducks could swim.
Why Is The ACLU Tax Exempt?
Any thinking person would wonder why the hell the ACLU is still tax exempt. These people put their noses in so many politically based arguments that they simply cannot possibly warrant the tax exempt status they enjoy. The ACLU almost…
Stop The ACLU Blogburst
The American Civil Liberties Union is destroying America?s culture and Constitution, while the federal government allows it to operate as a nonprofit, tax-exempt charitable organization.
Pencilnub, I am aware of that and noted it in the text of this post. You might have missed it, it was a long post. Anyway, what the ACLU did here does cross the line. This is why one of its own branches, surely aware of the ACLU’s two sided sword, raised objections.
StopThe ACLU Blogburst
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads oppo…
That two branch trick is used by other supposedly liberal Non Profit organizations. It is a legal loophole. There may also me conservative organizations that do the same thing. It seems to me churches could to the same thing by forming a branch which was active in politics and all donation to it were tax deductible.
If the non profit portion gave the profit portion donation would it circumvent the law that would strip their non profit status> What happens to their tax exempt status if the non profit portion advertises for the profit portion?
Remember John the Baptist would have lost his tax exempt status in the United States when he criticized Herod. I suppose it is better than loosing his head.
Stop The ACLU Blogburst 10-12-06
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads oppo…
[...] ACLU Should Loose its Tax Exempt Status By david Crossposted from Stop The ACLU [...]
[...] ACLU Should Loose Its Tax Exempt Status By admin Crossposted from Stop The ACLU [...]
[...] Crossposted from Stop The ACLU [...]
[...] As if putting out over a dozen political ads opposing particular candidates wasn’t enough to show their partisanship, Caroline just comes out and says it. What happened to the ACLU’s proud claim that they are “wholly non-partisan, neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor Democrat?” Nevermind that old cliche slogan, the ACLU now claim they are the most Conservative organization. So lets look at some of the things they are trying to conserve this election season. [...]
ACLU Get Out The Vote
Crossposted from STACLU This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting…
[...] As if putting out over a dozen political ads opposing particular candidates wasn’t enough to show their partisanship, Caroline just comes out and says it. What happened to the ACLU’s proud claim that they are “wholly non-partisan, neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor Democrat?” Nevermind that old cliche slogan, the ACLU now claim they are the most Conservative organization. So lets look at some of the things they are trying to conserve this election season. [...]
[...] As if putting out over a dozen political ads opposing particular candidates wasn’t enough to show their partisanship, Caroline just comes out and says it. What happened to the ACLU’s proud claim that they are “wholly non-partisan, neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor Democrat?” Nevermind that old cliche slogan, the ACLU now claim they are the most Conservative organization. So lets look at some of the things they are trying to conserve this election season. [...]
[...] As if putting out over a dozen political ads opposing particular candidates wasn’t enough to show their partisanship, Caroline just comes out and says it. What happened to the ACLU’s proud claim that they are “wholly non-partisan, neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor Democrat?” Nevermind that old cliche slogan, the ACLU now claim they are the most Conservative organization. So lets look at some of the things they are trying to conserve this election season. [...]
[...] As with Mission 1, the ACLU’s application of Equal Protection Under the Law is selective at best. Equal protection, in the ACLU’s agenda, doesn’t apply to parental rights especially when the rights to direct education, or even be aware our daughters are pregnant and thinking about an abortion. For the ACLU equal protection doesn’t apply to organizations like the Boy Scouts, and doesn’t apply to our Churches and faith based organizations. The ACLU can hide behind its own non-profit, tax free status, and push specific political agendas while trying to pull away the tax free status of Christian Churches. [...]
[...] ….except when they want to. Then they take out full page political ads opposing candidates that they do not like. They didn’t hide the fact they wanted a Democratic controlled Senate to kill the NSA program. “The American people have spoken,” said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “The lame-duck session should not be used to ram through proposals that the American people have clearly rejected. The rule of law has been seriously compromised over the past five years, and lawmakers must now seek to reaffirm our commitment to fundamental freedoms.” [...]
[...] ….except when they want to. Then they take out full page political ads opposing candidates that they do not like. They didn’t hide the fact they wanted a Democratic controlled Senate to kill the NSA program. “The American people have spoken,” said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “The lame-duck session should not be used to ram through proposals that the American people have clearly rejected. The rule of law has been seriously compromised over the past five years, and lawmakers must now seek to reaffirm our commitment to fundamental freedoms.” [...]
[...] ….except when they want to. Then they take out full page political ads opposing candidates that they do not like. They didn’t hide the fact they wanted a Democratic controlled Senate to kill the NSA program. “The American people have spoken,” said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “The lame-duck session should not be used to ram through proposals that the American people have clearly rejected. The rule of law has been seriously compromised over the past five years, and lawmakers must now seek to reaffirm our commitment to fundamental freedoms.” [...]
[...] Leading up to the elections the ACLU did not hide the fact that they wanted the Democrats in charge. The ACLU have a lot to cheer about. They know that the liberal left will help them further their agenda. We are already seeing it happen. The Democrats are the ACLU’s best vehicle towards shaping America into their vision. [...]
[...] Leading up to the elections the ACLU did not hide the fact that they wanted the Democrats in charge. The ACLU have a lot to cheer about. They know that the liberal left will help them further their agenda. We are already seeing it happen. The Democrats are the ACLU’s best vehicle towards shaping America into their vision. [...]
[...] Leading up to the elections the ACLU did not hide the fact that they wanted the Democrats in charge. The ACLU have a lot to cheer about. They know that the liberal left will help them further their agenda. We are already seeing it happen. The Democrats are the ACLU’s best vehicle towards shaping America into their vision. [...]