Wasn’t Karl Rove Supposed To Be Indicted?
Posted on May 15, 2006
I saw it all over the the left side of the blogosphere this weekend, as all the lefties jumped on the party wagon to celebrate Karl Rove being indicted today. So what happened?
So when is that Karl Rove indictment supposed to be handed down, anyway?
I’m not able to hold the front page forever, you know. Not to mention that I have some housework to do.
Rick Moran calls it a fairy tale.
Well, according to the NY Sun, it doesn’t look like it will have a happily ever after ending for the liberals.
A spokesman for a top White House aide under scrutiny in a criminal leak probe, Karl Rove, yesterday vigorously denied an Internet report that the political adviser to President Bush was told that he had been indicted on charges of perjury and lying to investigators.
“The story is a complete fabrication,” the spokesman for Mr. Rove, Mark Corallo, told The New York Sun. “It is both malicious and disgraceful.”
Hat tip: Michelle Malkin
Update: Wizbang has the disturbing photo!
» Filed Under News
Trackback URL
Comments
One Response to “Wasn’t Karl Rove Supposed To Be Indicted?”































Maybe that is why Mass is under water… all that liberal crying…