Enemy Within Part I
Posted on July 18, 2005
Recently the ACLU has been in a panic, shredding documents with one hand, and grabbing for Freedom Of Information with the other. What are they wanting? They want their hands on the 1,173 pages the FBI are investigating related to the ACLU.
“I know for an absolute fact that we have not been involved in anything related to promoting terrorism and yet the government has collected almost 1,200 pages on our activities,’ Romero said. ‘Why is the ACLU now the subject of scrutiny from the FBI?”‘ Source
Not promoting terrorism? The ACLU has opposed almost everything the government has done to fight terrorism! From the no-fly list to stronger border control, the ACLU has been there to oppose it. But this isn’t anything new. During their history, the ACLU has found many strange ways to distort the intentions of our founding Fathers in order to grant immunity and protection for sworn enemies of America to carry out their assault on America. Let’s take a look into history and see the MANY reasons the ACLU should be under investigation.
Sometimes their support of terrorists and their activities are subtle, like their strong objection to the use of metal detectors in America’s airports. Other times, it is much more direct.
“Like their representation of Phillip Agee. Agee is a former CIA employee who has revealed CIA secrets and names of CIA agents. When the state Department attempted to revoke Agee’s passport, the ACLU came to his defense. Where did Agee want to go? This was in 1980, during the Iran hostage crisis. He wanted to go to Iran to help Khomeini’s terrorists decipher CIA documents!”Source
The ACLU sees nothing wrong with Americans becoming traitors and selling classified government information. In 1985 Samuel L. Morrison, an employee of the Naval Intelligence Support Command was convicted and sentenced for stealing classified spy satellite photographs from his office, cutting off the “secret” designation and selling them to a foreign publication. The ACLU claimed that Morrison had the right to steal and sell these classified documents and the under the First Amendment.
Positions like these might be easier to understand if we look at ACLU Policy #117. They title this policy “Controlling the Intelligence Agencies”. ”
Limit the CIA, under the new name of the Foreign Intelligence Agency, to collecting and evaluating foreign intelligence information. Abolish all covert operations. Limit the FBI to criminal investigations by eliminating all COINTEL-PRO-type activity and all foreign and domestic intelligence investigations of groups or individuals unrelated to a specific criminal offense.
Prohibit entirely wiretaps, tapping of telecommunications and burglaries. Restrict mail openings, mail covers, inspection of bank records, and inspection of telephone records….”
In other words they want the CIA to be completely ineffective, along with the FBI.
Since the 1960’s, the P.L.O. has conducted a world-wide campaign of terror and violence, openly declaring the U.S.A. to be their enemy and therefore a target for their terrorist acts.
In addition, there is overwhelming evidence that other “information offices”, like the one in Washington have actually been “safe houses”, from which terrorist attacks were launched or where huge stockpiles of weapons were amassed and stored. Source
So the State Department shut this P.L.O office down. Their decision was met with overwhelming approval of the American people.
One family in particular welcomed it more than most. The family of Robert Stethem, the young Navy diver who, during the terrorist hijacking of TWA Flight 847 in 1985, was beaten, tortured and thrown from the airplane to bleed to death on the runway.
When President and Mrs. Reagan visited Arlington National cemetery to pay their respects to Robert, they told his family, “Be strong, be patient. Robbie’s death will not have been in vain.”
However, it was hard for the Stethems not to feel that Robbie’s death had indeed been in vain. They said, “the emissaries of the Palestine Liberation Organization terror are permitted to operate within the shadow of the White House.”
The Stethems were actively involved with then Congressman Jack Kemp and others in putting pressure on the State Department to close the P.L.O. office.
In a powerful plea to the American people the Stethems passionately stated, “It’s time to set an example for the Western leaders and show the world that the United States of America is deadly serious about the war against terrorism.
“We believe that the will of American citizens through this legislation, demands that our senators and representatives act decisively and expeditiously to close P.L.O.-financed outlets which promulgate P.L.O. terrorist policies. How many more American citizens must feel such loss, hurt and pain before all elected officials act forcefully.
Robbie suffered an extremely painful death. Alone and bleeding, he was left to die on the airport runway in a foreign country. Young marines have been burned alive far away from home and families. An elderly gentleman was shot and thrown overboard, helpless to survive. Are we to allow the P.L.O. representatives to get a foothold on our soil? Are we to allow them to continue working, living and enjoying American freedoms and our way of life and at the same time, finance terror and P.L.O. policies? We say, no!” Source
Perhaps the Stethems were some of the “good guys” that Glasser was talking about. Anyway, while the Stethems, the State Department and the American people were saying “no”, the ACLU was saying “yes
When the State department decided to shut the office down, the ACLU started screaming about civil rights and first amendment guarantees, and took it to court.
Fortunately, U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Richey rejected the ACLU’s claims and allowed the State department order to stand. Of course, this didn’t stop the ACLU. The immediately appealed. They were determined to protect these murderer’s under the first amendment. They failed again, and the court upheld the foreign policy interests of the United States in fighting terrorism.
After the second failure, the ACLU decided not to take the case to the Supreme Court. Perhaps this time the pressure of the “good guys” was a little too much for them. The pressure of the “good guys” always need to be on the ACLU.
We are planning to gather all the “good guys” to put some pressure on the ACLU! We want to organize a nation wide march on all of the ACLU offices across America. Like a ninja in stealth, the ACLU is slowly assassinating our great nation. Help us raise the money to advertise this, and make our efforts a success. Visit our store! Buy a bumper sticker! Or donate with the donation button in my sidebar. Thank you for the support!
Thanks Jawa Report
Mudville Gazette
» Filed Under Illegal Activities, War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
39 Responses to “Enemy Within Part I”
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Great post
Karl Rove loves Terrorists!!!!!!1
thank you for that insightful wisdom Paul, and thank you for staying on topic. I’m sure that you completely skipped over the entire text of the article just to leave us with such a pleasant message.
That seems about on par for the ACLU — no covert operatives in the CIA. After all, everyone else in the world is nice and no one ever lies to the US. We should just let all the other countries do whatever they want.
Another great post Jay, and I am glad to be off of vacation after reading such literature like this post truly is.
Thanks for always keeping us up to date Jay. I always wonder what percentage of the American populace thinks that the ACLU is a good and honest organization.
Not only is Paul illiterate…..he’s ignorant.
Good post. It’s not surprising that the ACLU, or at least the less sensible aspects of it, have directly or indirectl supported terrorists. This is the organization that defends the freedom of everyone except Americans after all. Where does the ACLU get it’s lawyers? I’d like to know so I never hire a lawyer from that university.
This has to be the quote of the year. Or stupid question of the year: “Why is the ACLU now the subject of scrutiny from the FBI?” Well, I don’t know Mr. Remero, perhaps because you defend terrorists? You freakin idiot… What a maroon…
Lol, maroon.
Hey guys, I just found something out!
Apparently, according to the ACLU and the left-wing moonbat patrol, my mother hugs a terrorist every day……
ME! I’m the terrorist who fought in OIF and OEF for no reason.
What a concept.
Does the heart godd knowing the the FBI has a file on the ACLU.
Is there a way to order stuff from the store without using a credit card, I got rid of mine.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic
Sure is David..through paypal. You can set up a paypal account for free and it is secure and comes out of your bank.
Ugghhh…
Jay come read a little observation about my flight home today from Vegas.
Great post. I’m surprised that the ACLU hasn’t offered to defend Saddam and I’m sure when Bin Laden is captured, (if he’s not killed first) that the ACLU will come to his defense! Defending the indefensable! The ACLU motto!
Ken Taylor
Jay, Thanks for the info and for getting me to stop back. This trip back I noticed I can’t spell #12 in the comments godd should have been good.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic
Very nice
Culinary Arts College
Job Search Engine
Top Ten List of Why the ACLU needs to be Stopped
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Stop The ACLU was started on February 9th, 2004. We started with high hopes, and we realized we were facing a goliath. There were many reasons why we thought the ACLU needed to be countered,…
[...] #3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
[...] #3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
[...] #3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
Roll the dice
Today’s dose of NIF - News, Interesting & Funny … It’s Stop the ACLU Thursday (+ Open Trackbacks)
[...] It isn’t a far fetched idea to wonder if the ACLU uses its funds to support terrorism. The ACLU’s history is tainted in this arena. In 1985 Samuel L. Morrison, an employee of the Naval Intelligence Support Command was convicted and sentenced for stealing classified spy satellite photographs from his office, cutting off the “secret” designation and selling them to a foreign publication. The ACLU claimed that Morrison had the right to steal and sell these classified documents and the under the First Amendment. Positions like these might be easier to understand if we look at ACLU Policy #117. They title this policy “Controlling the Intelligence Agencies”. ” [...]
The ACLU’s War on National Security
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU In conjunction with the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU has lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports for years. “Profiles are notoriously under-inclusive,” says ACLU legi…
[...] It isn’t a far fetched idea to wonder if the ACLU uses its funds to support terrorism. The ACLU’s history is tainted in this arena. In 1985 Samuel L. Morrison, an employee of the Naval Intelligence Support Command was convicted and sentenced for stealing classified spy satellite photographs from his office, cutting off the “secret” designation and selling them to a foreign publication. The ACLU claimed that Morrison had the right to steal and sell these classified documents and the under the First Amendment. Positions like these might be easier to understand if we look at ACLU Policy #117. They title this policy “Controlling the Intelligence Agencies”. ” [...]
[...] The ACLU are not only fighting every effort the government attempts to protect America, they are actively defending our enemies, to the point of telling detainees that they have a right to refuse to answer their interregators. Its nothing new, they have a long history of defending the enemy when America is at war. [...]
amen!
[...] The list is endless on this one. They have defended traitors funding Hamas, the PLO, and confessed Al-Qaeda operatives. [...]
[...] The list is endless on this one. They have defended traitors funding Hamas, the PLO, and confessed Al-Qaeda operatives. [...]
[...] The list is endless on this one. They have defended traitors funding Hamas, the PLO, and confessed Al-Qaeda operatives. [...]
[...] The list is endless on this one. They have defended traitors funding Hamas, the PLO, and confessed Al-Qaeda operatives. [...]
[...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
[...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
[...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
[...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]
ACLU Roots
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it’s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU’s founding. Does…
“Stop the ACLU” BlogBurst: A Short History Of The ACLU
Cross posted from Stop the ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it’s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU’s founding….